This website may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Comparison · Microcurrent

FOREO BEAR 2 vs NuFACE: Which Microcurrent Device Is Right for You?

FOREO BEAR 2 and NuFACE are two of the better-known names in at-home microcurrent skincare. Both brands offer handheld devices designed to bring microcurrent into a regular beauty routine, but the products are not identical.

7 min read· Last updated August 2026· By The PoshBrand Editors
FOREO BEAR 2 microcurrent device product render on a warm neutral background

BEAR 2 vs NuFACE at a glance

FeatureFOREO BEAR 2NuFACE
Main technologyMicrocurrent + T-Sonic pulsationsMicrocurrent
Device formatHandheldHandheld
Treatment approachMicrocurrent combined with facial massageMicrocurrent-focused treatment
App supportYesYes, depending on device
Best forPeople interested in microcurrent plus additional device featuresPeople looking for a dedicated microcurrent system

What is FOREO BEAR 2?

FOREO BEAR 2 is a handheld facial toning device that combines microcurrent with T-Sonic pulsations.

It also includes FOREO's Anti-Shock System, which is designed to measure skin resistance and adjust the microcurrent accordingly.

The device connects with the FOREO app, where guided treatments can be selected.

This makes BEAR 2 more than a simple microcurrent device. It combines several elements into one treatment experience.

Read our full FOREO BEAR 2 review

What is NuFACE?

NuFACE focuses heavily on microcurrent facial devices.

Its range includes several device options, with the NuFACE Trinity being one of the best-known products in the category.

The basic concept is similar: a handheld device is moved across the face during a guided treatment using conductive gel or activator.

For someone who specifically wants a dedicated microcurrent routine, NuFACE is therefore one of the most obvious alternatives to consider.

What is the main difference?

The most noticeable difference is how each brand builds its device experience around microcurrent.

BEAR 2 combines microcurrent with T-Sonic pulsations and additional device technology.

NuFACE places microcurrent more firmly at the centre of the treatment.

That distinction may sound small, but it can matter if you are choosing a device based on how you want your routine to feel. For a broader look at how every FOREO device compares, see our guide to how to choose the right FOREO device.

Which is easier to use?

Both are handheld devices, so neither is completely passive.

You need to move the device across the face according to the recommended treatment technique.

Both brands also provide guided routines, which can make it easier to establish a consistent treatment pattern.

The better option therefore depends less on the number of features and more on which device you find easier to incorporate into your routine.

Which one is better for beginners?

Either can be a reasonable starting point for someone interested in microcurrent, provided the device is used according to the manufacturer's instructions.

For a beginner, however, the most important thing is understanding how microcurrent treatments are supposed to be performed.

Using the correct activator or conductive product, following the treatment instructions and starting with the recommended routine are more important than simply choosing the device with the longest feature list.

BEAR 2 vs NuFACE: which should you choose?

Choose FOREO BEAR 2 if:

  • You want microcurrent combined with T-Sonic pulsations.
  • You like beauty devices with multiple features.
  • You want app-guided treatments.
  • You prefer FOREO's device ecosystem.

Choose NuFACE if:

  • Microcurrent is your primary reason for buying a device.
  • You want a brand strongly focused on microcurrent facial treatments.
  • You prefer the NuFACE treatment system and accessories.
  • You are interested in choosing between several NuFACE device options.

What about the overall routine?

This may ultimately be more important than the device itself.

Microcurrent devices are not a one-time treatment. They are designed to be incorporated into a routine.

That means the best device is the one you understand, enjoy using and can realistically use according to its recommended schedule.

A device with more features is not automatically the better purchase if you rarely use those features.

The bottom line

FOREO BEAR 2 and NuFACE are both worth considering if microcurrent is the technology you are looking for.

BEAR 2 is particularly interesting if you want microcurrent combined with T-Sonic pulsations and FOREO's broader beauty-device ecosystem.

NuFACE is a natural choice if you want a brand whose products are strongly centred around microcurrent facial treatments.

There is no universal winner.

The better choice is the system that fits the type of treatment you want and the routine you are most likely to maintain.

Continue reading

The Dispatch

New reviews, in your inbox.

Once a week: the most rigorous anti-aging research, the products worth your money, and the ones to skip.